The blade wielded by the Sydney, Australia church attacker failed to open when the target of the attack, Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel, held up a Cross for protection, likely saving his life. Bishop Mar Mari was struck with the closed knife several times, including in the face, before the attacker realized that his blade had malfunctioned.

As National File reported in the wake of the attack:

A knife-wielding attacker stormed the pulpit of Sydney, Australia’s Christ The Good Shepherd Church and appeared to stab Bishop Mar Mari in the face, before unleashing a fury of additional stabs and slashes, leaving multiple other people injured as congregants quickly fought to subdue him.

Because the Monday night service was being live streamed, video footage of the attack became available online immediately and has quickly gone viral…

When the video footage is examined, it’s realized that the attacker’s blade did not open as he lunged toward Bishop Mar Mari, likely saving the Bishop’s life as several bladeless blows made contact with the area of his face and neck. As this aspect of the story has made the rounds online, faithful Christians are praising God and some are saying that Bishop Mar Mari was saved by way of direct intervention, with the Cross he held in his hand serving as a shield of protection.

By the time the attacker realized his blade had failed him, he was being surrounded by parishioners who were rushing to the defense of Bishop Mar Mari, multiple of whom were injured, along with a Priest, in the process.

Full Video: Bishop Stabbed at Pulpit in Anti-Christian Attack

While much of the 15-year-old suspect’s background has not been made clear to the public, law enforcement has confirmed that anti-Christian terrorism was his motivation, and several translations have claimed that as he stormed the pulpit, he shouted in Arabic, “If they didn’t insult my prophet, I wouldn’t have come here,” denoting what many believe to be an Islamic background.

Related: Bishop Stabbed in Sydney Attack Spoke Against Zionist Aggression, Radical Islam, and Marxist Subversion

Bravery is not the word for Tucker Carlson’s latest show. He expounded upon the treatment of Christians in light of the war in Gaza, asking the simple question, how are Christians being treated when America enters these foreign conflicts?

To Carlson, the sacrifices of Christians aren’t very much acknowledged or even mentioned — which appears to be true. But why is that? He asks while the Christian churches and their leaders remain silent.

“Standing up for Christians is not allowed in the US media,” said Carlson. He then resoundingly noted that Christians in Gaza aren’t afforded the same courtesy as the Israeli Jews, as their churches are blown to bits along with their people.

Ep. 91 How does the government of Israel treat Christians? In the West, Christian leaders don’t seem interested in knowing the answer. They should be. Here’s the view of a pastor from Bethlehem. pic.twitter.com/Gvo116ojnf

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) April 9, 2024

Carlson mentions Evangelicals who, in overwhelming numbers, tend to be staunch Zionists and seem not to mind the sacrificing of Christians for their supposed Jewish friends. He begins the discourse referencing former pastor and now-Rep. Tim Walberg, R-MI, who stated:

We shouldn’t be spending a dime on humanitarian aid. It should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick. The same should be in Ukraine. Defeat Putin quick. Instead of 80% of our funding for Ukraine being used for humanitarian purposes, it should be 80%-100% to wipe out Russian forces if that’s what we want to do.

“There is no excuse for that from a Christian perspective,” responded Carlson. “And we have a former pastor calling for it.”

Rev. Munther Issac, the pastor of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Bethlehem, spoke to Carlson. He said life is hard to bear for a lot of his parishioners under the IDF control:

We’ve always had a problem with American foreign policy when it comes to Palestine, Israel and the Middle East in general. I traveled to DC in December to advocate for a ceasefire. I don’t think war solves anything. We continued to be horrified by what we hear from Congress, well, of course, there are some exceptions on the Democratic side.

The pastor went on to say the “Religious Right” provides no sympathy whatsoever, claiming their knowledge of what is occurring in Gaza appears “very, very shallow,” and yet “they hold very strong opinions.” Rev. Issac said these perceptions are shaped by political parties’ positions and not based on “facts, being here.” He also said pastors, even here, preach the Zionist ideology as supreme.

Rev. Issac told Carlson the war machine has a damaging impact on the Christian community in the Middle East:

This is political and financial support from our sibling in Christ, rather than that support helping us or helping humanitarian causes or peace causes or attempts to bring Israelis and Palestinians together — its supporting initiatives that are causing our lives as a Christian community more and more difficult and causing many of us to leave because its as if there’s no future for us in this land.

Evangelicals (majority of Christian Zionists) are the most disliked by Jews, according to Pew Research.https://t.co/AWlioHhiEy pic.twitter.com/mEGEoUQN5g

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) April 2, 2024

Carlson goes on to note that Evangelical leaders care much more about the “highly secular government of Israel” than they care about Christian communities in the Middle East. Carlson asked the reverend why that is, and he responded:

Some of it is the theology of Christian Zionism that teaches, for example Christians must support Israel because the Bible teaches that, and often times that is part of a larger theology of the end times in which they view the presence of Jews in the land as preparing for the second coming of Christ.

The reverend warned that we are putting Jews into a sort of “object” that we are using for our own religion. He then went on to say the US ignores the crimes against humanity committed by Israel for the sake of religion. He told Carlson the US supports Israel unconditionally and without accountability. Rev. Issac hopes the Church will resolve the problem but admits the rocky road ahead.

He then remarked on the 18 Christians killed by a bomb that hit their Orthodox Church. Rev. Issac said they all thought the church was safe, which was a big surprise. He added:

Many Christian media outlets did not give it [attention] … American support for Christians is actually conditioned by where you stand on the political spectrum … Because Israel is an ally to America, no one cares about Christians being targeted; in fact, in the Catholic Church two elderly women were killed by Israeli snipers, and the Catholic Church talked about it.

He told Carlson the incident happened again, too. He said the Palestinians have had their home bombed and really won’t have a place to go once the war ends. The reverend said many of the people are starving. Many have also died due to lack of medical care. Rev. Issac told Carlson that this is “collective punishment against all Palestinians.” He then added that Israel looks at Christians as if their Palestinians.

Jerusalem: Jews spitting on Christian nuns. pic.twitter.com/GKtSZ0i1V3

— Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis (@DrLoupis) April 7, 2024

Rev. Issac said he wishes for political advocacy for peace and a solution when it comes to aid:

We will not survive as a Christian community if the situation of Palestinians is not solved. And since the creation of Israel, we’ve been under occupation, under different phases of that occupation, and the current status quo, as this Gaza War has proven, is not sustainable at all.

Rev. Issac is calling upon Christian leaders who understand the situation on the ground and can lobby for peace where Palestinians and Israelis live together. He said their perspective is never taken seriously, though. America never attempts at its proclaimed goal of a two-state solution.

Tucker then asked the reverend how free Christians are to practice their religion in Israel. Rev. Issac then responds:

It’s not a free as people think … Did you know Evangelical Christian churches are not recognized in Israel? By the government of Israel? Evangelism is illegal in Israel … It’s against the law to Evangelize in Israel.

He said Jewish converts to Evangelism go through many legal challenges. Evangelical Christianity is not officially recognized as a denomination in Israel. The reverend added that many politicians attempted to limit Christians from sharing their faith.

Rev. Issac said that in East Jerusalem, Christians are constantly targeted by “radical Jewish groups.” He said that once a church was set aflame. Christians are even usually spat upon. Rev. Issac told Carlson there are all these “incitements against Christians, especially in Jerusalem.” He also added that these radical Jewish supremacist groups are never held accountable.

Rev. Issac mentioned some of the laws of Israel that promote Jews over everyone else. He said Israel isn’t the democracy that the US establishment would want us to believe.

Is House Speaker Mike Johnson compromised by foreign lobbyists?

Well, after he pushed the $14 billion Israel aid package through, AIPAC rolled in the cash, donating $95,000 to Johnson.

Besides that payment, $250k was donated to him by pro-Israel groups between 2023-24. https://t.co/Wx98c427WL

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) April 7, 2024

Carlson then brought up the Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson, an Evangelical Christian and a staunch supporter of Israel for “theological reasons.” The reverend responded:

The problem is when you equate the modern secular State of Israel with the Israel of the Bible. The Israel of the Bible was a faith community in a covenant-relationship with God that was given the laws and asked to be alined to the nations and through that nation we as Christians believe Jesus came as a savior to the world.

The problem begins when you compare or when you equate the modern secular State of Israel, a political entity birthed in the 20th century with the people of Israel in the Bible.

He said the “chosen people” have become the “chosen state.” The Bible never talks about a chosen state. The reverend then remarked on the special treatment and privileges afforded to Jews in Israel. Rev. Issac said “chosenness” is about responsibility not about “entitlement.” He added that the problem here appears to be from the Christians.

“The solution to antisemitism should not be a blind support for Zionism,” said Rev. Issac. “Especially when this support of Zionism has come at the expense of Palestinians.”

"Losing 600 Israelis is the equivalent of losing about 20,000 Americans." – Rep. Ritchie Torres pic.twitter.com/GDJkoaycBT

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) April 9, 2024

Rev. Issac left Carlson by saying Israel was created on land that hosted millions of Palestinians, including Christians. Israel was created upon a sacrifice, and he urges the West and the Church to listen to his voice and perspective for our fellow Christians.

Matt Walsh: ‘Bow Before Israel (unless you’re an anti-Semite)!’

“When will we take Jesus’s word seriously about being peacemakers, about being merciful,” closed the reverend. “There must be other ways … Come and listen.”

Candace Owens Takes Aim at the Jewish Lobby

The Russian Orthodox Church pledged a “Russian World” under the eyes of God and the nationalist authority of the Kremlin during this “Holy War,” reported the Orthodox Times.

At the “World Russian People’s Council,” chaired by Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, the belief was announced, resonating much with the desire to regain the rightful Russian boundaries in present-day Ukraine. The Times claims this alignment with the Moscow Patriarchate and the Kremlin will only intensify.

The March 27 meeting resolved its shared belief in a document posted on the official Moscow Patriarchate’s website.

It is uncertain what will actually become of this enactment. Still, the Times believes it’s a good point of reference to evaluate the relationship between the Autocephalous Orthodox Churches towards the present-day Orthodox world. The outlet asserts that this stance is contradictory to Christian Orthodox teaching and uses faith to exploit “political expediencies.” However, after reading more in-depth, this alignment is, at heart, the purest form of Christianity.

The document is said to be a “political ‘regime’ manifesto,” creating the most clear concept of the “Russian World” or “Russkiy Mir.” These are aspirations akin to the West. The war in Ukraine is a short part of this precept but is written as:

… the national liberation struggle of the Russian people against the criminal regime in Kyiv and in the West, which backs it, and has been taking place in the territories of Southwest Russia since 2014. During this operation, the Russian people with weapons in hand, defend their life, freedom, statehood, cultural, religious, national and cultural identity, as well as the right to live on their own land, within the borders of a single Russian state.

It continues:

From a spiritual moral point of view, a special military operation is a Holy War, in which Russia and its people, defending the unified spiritual space of Holy Russia, fulfill the mission, protecting the world from the onslaught of globalization and the victory of the West, associated with Satanism. After the conclusion of the special operation, the entire territory of modern Ukraine will fall within Russia’s sphere of exclusive influence. The possibility of a Russophobic political regime in this territory, hostile to Russia and its people, as well as a political regime controlled by an external power hostile to Russia, must be completely ruled out.

The Times highlights that it is essentially an aspiration of “Russian world” dominance. The Church marks Russia as “the creator, supporter, and defender of the Russian world. The borders of the Russian world as a spiritual, cultural and cultural hub are significantly wider than the state borders of both today’s Russian Federation and wider Russia. Along with its representatives around the world, the Russian World includes all those who consider that the Russian tradition and culture are the highest values and the true meaning of life.”

The note also acknowledges the demographic crisis as a major threat to the “existence and development of Russia.” Solving the problem is thusly to embrace the traditional large family and its associated values. And with that — there are proposals via tax write-offs to encourage families to have three or even four children. The Orthodox Church pledges against post-modern abortion culture as well.

It doesn’t stop there as it slams immigration as a “deformation” to the nation with a massive influx of migrants who don’t speak the language or understand the history or the culture. The Church said these migrants are simply unable to integrate into Russian society. It hints further at advocating for amendments to immigration policies to protect the interests of the citizens. The Times notes that immigration will ultimately be geared toward cultural integration and for those loyal to Russia.

There is a mention of education to include:

… upbringing programs and educational initiatives need to be purged of detrimental ideological concepts and behaviors, particularly those of Western origin, which are alien to the Russian populace and detrimental to Russian society.

The document states the need for relocation of urbanites to the suburbs. Regional development and prioritizing of the construction industry as said only to help achieve a sustainable “natural development of the Russian population” and “high birth rates,” according to The Times.

The plan is believed to change Russia by 2050 “with 1000 formed medium-sized and small cities,” with the suburbs being the main focus. A whopping 80% of the population is expected to own homes and live independently, reads the statement.

Life on your homeland, within environmentally favorable and comfortable surroundings, in your own cozy abode where you can start a family, nurture children, and raise three or more offspring, should epitomize the tangible manifestation of the ideals of the Russian World.

Putin Says Biden Over Trump for ‘More Predictable’ U.S.

Corporate media has reported the Orthodox Church’s stance as being similar to the Third Reich. It is very typical for the mainstream media to rail on traditionalism and try to degrade nationalism as being Nazism. This won’t deter the Church or Russia, as they both seem to have very little care for Western media. But, as for the US, it should consider such a stance as a possible pivoting point as to what was once contrived as “Make America Great Again.”

Russian FSB Chief Says US, Ukraine, Britain are Behind Concert Hall Attack

After a plethora of accusations of antisemitism, the former Daily Wire commentator Candace Owens laid waste to the narrative and the pure dishonesty used against her.

Owens began by addressing another Daily Wire commentator, Andrew Klavan, who had “been spreading some inaccuracies” she viewed as “disparaging” to her character. She posted a thread unraveling it all, including the radical claims that “Christ is King” is somehow antisemitic.

Andrew Klavan, in an attempt to explain why “Christ is King” can be antisemitic offered this on a podcast about me: pic.twitter.com/gbmx39aKGs

— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) March 27, 2024

Owens then dove into the accusations of her liking a post that alluded to Jews drinking Christian blood. She called it a smear campaign, particularly by everyone Rabbi Shmuley — the adult sex toy businessman.

The rabbi was clearly lying. The person who messaged him privately in that correspondence did so BEFORE I had ever informed the public about his harassment.

It was quite literally a smear.

Gratefully, someone called him out on this lie by citing the date of the message: pic.twitter.com/t4nlZ6Cu7Z

— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) March 27, 2024

Owens added that she simply liked a post by a “random person on the internet who very quickly debunked the horrendous lie that” she “would ever send any person to threaten to murder Jews.”

She then came to some deep conclusions about the so-called “antisemitism racket.” 

I recently learned that antisemitism is unlike any hate in the world—because the definition mutates. Today’s current definition seems to be: A Christian defending herself from a predatory, dishonest Rabbi by liking a tweet for the OBVIOUS reason that it debunked his lie.

Owens reiterated her final message that “It really is nothing short of amazing that given all of the threats that Rabbi Shmuley made … what seemingly disturbed Andrew [Klaven] (or at least what moved him to action” was simply her “unacceptable ‘like’ of a tweet which underscored the Rabbi’s dishonesty.”

Owens may not be familiar with what “antisemitism” means as the definition seems to be constantly revised. “Christ is King” is now somehow antisemitic, but really, that labeling is deeply anti-Christian. Most Christians know this or are too afraid to rebuke the claim.

Coming back to the definition of “antisemitism,” it is believed by some to be used to leverage and protect Jewish power against dissent. The term alone can cancel an individual much faster than accusations of racism. The question is: why is that?

The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) is the ultimate decider of what is and isn’t antisemitic. The IHRA has a “working definition” of antisemitism, which is extremely broad and perhaps purposeful in light of the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas.

It also reads:

Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.

The IHRA adds several contemporary examples of antisemitism, too:

• Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.

• Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.

• Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

• Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).

• Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

• Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

• Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

• Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

• Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.

• Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

• Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

According to the IHRA, everything, including criticism of Israel, is “off-limits.” It just appears as if only one group is truly considered victimized, and that group is not accountable for their actions. These “antisemitism” devices act as protections — yes — but also shielding from addressing problems within the community.

The Daily Wire Confirms Israel First Position

No other group has that, and it appears more and more people as awakening to that fact, especially after the cancelling of the leading black conservative commentator — Candace Owens.

Matt Walsh: ‘Bow Before Israel (unless you’re an anti-Semite)!’

Pop star Taylor Swift wore devil horns in 2007, according to sources familiar with the music industry. The photo and video below were taken during 32nd degree Freemason Brad Paisley’s “Bonfires and Amplifiers” tour, which featured a teenage Swift as an opening act. Swift is featured in the photo with country singer Rodney Atkins.

Here is Taylor Swift dancing in devil horns and dressed in a “Lady In Red” style during Atkins’ performance in 2007, according to a source:

The photograph and video are newsworthy after Taylor Swift’s appearance at the Super Bowl, where her friend Ice Spice made the devil-horns hand sign while wearing an upside-down cross necklace. The upside-down cross, also known as the inverted cross, is an icon within Satanism in some cases.

In Taylor Swift’s recent music video “Karma,” which features Ice Spice, Swift wears an Eyes Wide Shut-style mask as all kinds of darkness goes on, including the blasphemous line “Karma is a g-d.”

Of course, Taylor Swift is no stranger to the “All-Seeing Eye” hand gesture and the “devil horns” hand gesture.

Taylor Swift supports abortion, according to her comments in the 2020 documentary Miss Americana, which led to a political back-and-forth between Swift and Tennessee Republican senator Marsha Blackburn. The media is already speculating about the impact that Swift could have in a general election if she chooses to insert herself into the political discussion and inflict her opinions on America.

The music industry is rife with Satanic references. The late rapper XXXTentacion performed a song called “I Spoke To The Devil In Miami” that included the line “Spoke to a baphomet.” XXXTentacion wondered aloud whether he would be a “sacrifice” shortly before he was murdered.

Remember the Grammys when Sam Smith and Kim Petras performed a song called “Unholy”?

Meanwhile, Taylor Swift’s boyfriend Travis Kelce continues to face online backlash after he got caught on a sideline camera bumping into his 65-year old head coach Andy Reid and screaming in Reid’s face during the Super Bowl, apparently because Kelce wanted to go into the game. Though the Pfizer spokesman and Kansas City Chiefs tight end tried to play the scandal off at first with a joking tone, Kelce eventually had to admit his own misconduct.

The Chiefs won the Super Bowl, but Kelce’s attack on Reid left a bitter after-taste to the event, similar to the much-ballyhooed “holding” call that clinched the Chiefs victory in the Super Bowl last time around.

Travis Kelce confessed that he was wrong on his brother Jason Kelce’s podcast. Travis agreed with Jason’s assertion that Travis “crossed the line.”

“I felt bad for Andy because Andy had had hip surgery. He had his game plan in his hand. And when Kelce went over, Kelce didn’t push him, Kelce went over and he accidentally bumped him, I don’t think he pushed him or anything. It was an accident, but it looked bad on television,” former Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback and longtime broadcaster Terry Bradshaw stated on Rich Eisen’s show.

Though “Inside the NFL” on the CW Network had Travis Kelce wearing a microphone for the game, the show did not broadcast audio from the Kelce-Reid incident, prompting suspicion that the Chiefs might have intervened to prevent the release of that audio. If it ever gets released, that audio would certainly get ratings!

The show Nashville featured Hayden Panetierre’s pop star character (who might have been based on Taylor Swift) dating and marrying a pro football quarterback after their publicity teams got them together to create a spectacle. On the show, Panetierre’s character married the quarterback and then quickly backed out and got an annulment, leaving the football player and his family embarrassed.

If life imitates art, and art nowadays is mostly just shallow pop culture narratives, does that mean the “Travis Kelce” storyline is getting written out of the New World Order idol worship script? I guess we will have to find out, since the mainstream media is going to continue inflicting both of these people on us whether they break up or not.

A lot of people have been getting tired of the Kelce-Swift storyline. But Travis Kelce criticized “cranky NFL fans” who are not captivated by his media-baiting romance with Swift.

“I’m having fun with it, the majority of the world is having fun with it, outside of all the cranky NFL fans who just don’t want to see the Chiefs win,” Kelce said of his relationship with Swift during an appearance on the talk show of ESPN pundit Pat McAfee. “And you know what, we’re slowly reeling ’em in. We’re slowly reeling ’em in. They just, they’re fighting it right now.”

Kelce has used his platform in sports to become a paid shill for the Pfizer coronavirus needle injection, which has been widely linked to myocarditis and other ailments and associated with strokes and heart attacks caused by blood clotting.

New York Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers, who bravely resisted the Scamdemic needle, called Kelce “Mr. Pfizer” at one point, and Kelce clearly got a little defensive about getting called out for his Big Pharma shilling.

“I thought it was pretty good. I mean, with the ‘stashe right now I look like a guy named Mr. Pfizer. Who knew I’d get into the vax wars with Aaron Rodgers? It’s Mr. Pfizer versus the Johnson and Johnson family over there, man,” Kelce said in a press conference, referring to Woody Johnson, the owner of Rodgers’ team the New York Jets.

“Once I got the vaccine, I got it because of keeping myself safe, keeping my family safe. The people in this building. So, yeah, I stand by it, one thousand percent, and I’m fully comfortable with him calling me Mr. Pfizer,” Travis Kelce shilled.

Kelce’s mom was even in a Pfizer commercial with him, adding another layer of cynicism to the wickedness of the Kelce brand.

Did Travis Kelce sell his soul? If so, Taylor Swift might end up getting a starring role in a new remake of Bedazzled…that is, if she still has the horns!

An MSNBC panelist on the All In with Chris Hayes program claimed that the rights of Americans don’t come from God, but rather from the federal government, specifically naming Congress and the Supreme Court as the arbiters of human rights. Those who echo America’s Founding Fathers in believing that human rights come from God and not man, are Trump-aligned Christian Nationalists, she said.

Politico reporter Heidi Przybyla, who has obsessively reported on her own claims that Christian Nationalists are preparing to seize control of the United States, appeared this week on MSNBC’s All In program, which was being guest hosted by Michael Steele, a failed RNC Chairman and anti-Trumper.

While there, Przybyla claimed that the rights of Americans, and all human beings for that matter, do not come from God, but instead come from the government.

“The one thing that unites all of them, because there’s many different groups orbiting Trump, the thing that unites them as Christian Nationalists, not Christians by the way because Christian Nationalism is very different, is that they believe that our rights as Americans, as all human beings, don’t come from any earthly authority,” Przybyla said.

Christian Nationalists, she went on, believe that their basic rights “don’t come from Congress, they don’t come from the Supreme Court, they come from God.”

Hear the Remarks in the Video Clip Below: 

Here @MSNBC helpfully makes it clear their disdain for Christians in America.

She says that if you believe that your rights come from God, you aren’t a Christian, you are a Christian nationalist.

Somehow they seem to not mention that our own founding documents make this… pic.twitter.com/WTLMqcqTzg

— Wade Miller (@WadeMiller_USMC) February 23, 2024

The absurd remarks from Heidi Przybyla come as Christ-hating uni-party members launch an all-out anti-Christian offensive against Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, as Christian Americans, and other people of faith, including Muslims, finally begin standing up to the radically globalist, pro-trans, pro-usury ruling class.

At a recent rally in Tennessee, 45th President Trump pledged to establish a new task force to fight anti-Christian bias, and vowed that “No one will be touching the Cross of Christ under the Trump administration.”

Trump also told supporters who gathered at the Nashville rally, a city in which a trans terrorist slaughtered 6 Christians, including 3 children last year, that the renewed Trump Administration “will protect God in our public square.”

Related: They’re Just Getting Started…Transgender Militants Call for Widespread Violence Against Christians

There’s an unmistakable war being waged against Christianity that has escalated in recent decades and was on full display at this year’s Super Bowl, during both the game and the commercial breaks. 

In recent years, we’ve witnessed churches flying pride flags, hosting drag shows, and even some churches claiming that God is “non-binary.”

The “He Gets Us” Super Bowl ad that was aired about a week ago, was yet another example of how the world has distorted Christianity to align with a politically woke agenda.

The multi-million dollar ad portrayed what was supposed to be Jesus washing the feet of a gay man, a woman at an abortion clinic, and a BLM rioter. The ad ended with text that read, “Jesus didn’t teach hate. He washed feet.”

There is only one story in the New Testament of Jesus washing feet and it was at the Passover meal before his crucifixion. Jesus washed the feet of his Disciples–the people closest to him and the people who had been following him his entire ministry, not the Pharisees. Jesus was not washing the feet of every unbeliever and sinner he encountered. He came and died for all of us but He was a servant to those willing to be served by Him—not those who opposed Him. While that did include washing the feet of Judas, Pastor Mark Driscoll pointed out on X that: “Jesus washed Judas’ feet and still sent him to Hell.”

In short, the entire premise of the ad was that Jesus didn’t teach hate, he washed feet– and that’s it. The ad also implies Jesus was accepting of all kinds of sinful behavior– and he wasn’t. The ad only touched upon a very small aspect of Christianity. It addresses that Jesus was loving but completely disregards the part where He is also wrathful. The ad portrays Jesus as someone who came to bring peace and didn’t come to make anyone uncomfortable. That is not Biblical. Biblical Jesus came in flipping tables and standing for Truth.

“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.” -Matthew 10:34

Many Christians defended this advertisement, claiming that it was supposed to appeal to “secular liberals” and that “if this advertisement is able to bring someone to our side then so be it.” But, Christianity isn’t supposed to appeal to a secular crowd, it’s supposed to offend them. If you can preach the Gospel and your message appeals to a gay man, a transgender person, an atheist, and a woman who gets abortions, then you aren’t preaching the Gospel.

If it wasn’t obvious enough that this ad was nothing more than Leftist propaganda cloaked as Christianity, consider heading to the “He Gets Us” website.

The very first thing they have displayed on their homepage is a message that reads:

“How did the story of Jesus, the world’s greatest love story, get twisted into a tool to judge, harm, and divide? How do we remind people the story of Jesus belongs to everyone? These questions are the beating heart of He Gets Us.

In their FAQs, one question reads “What is your stance on the LGBTQ+ community?” Their response was,

“Jesus loves gay people and Jesus loves trans people. The LGBTQ+ community, like all people, is invited to explore the story of Jesus and consider his example of unconditional love, grace, and forgiveness of others. No matter who you are, YOU are invited to explore the story of Jesus and consider what it means for your life.”

The appropriate answer to that question would have been 1 Corinthians 6:9-11:

“Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.”

In short, you will go to Hell. But God sent his only son to die on the Cross to redeem you and save you from eternal damnation

Additionally, the website is filled with articles that look like CNN published them. Here are just a few of them: How did Jesus step over barriers of race, gender, and stigma on the side of the road?”; “Jesus was exclusively inclusive.”; “Jesus overcame bias, too”; and “Four Ways Jesus Supported Women’s Equality”. 

He Gets Us– yes, but he also changes us, calls us to repent and turn away from our sin– which they make no mention of anywhere on their website. “Go and sin no more.” – John 8:11

The bottom line is that the advertisement was blasphemous. The people behind He Gets Us had an opportunity to tell the truth about Jesus and salvation to hundreds of millions of people. Instead, they chose to lie to millions of people and portray Jesus in a way that fits a secular and woke narrative.

Christians who defended the ad are exactly part of the problem. Many Christians today have become much more concerned with offending man than offending God, so they distort the truth and water down the Gospel– and that is how we ended up as a country that doesn’t dare to mock the Muslims or the Jews, but one that openly mocks Jesus and Christianity.

“Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand firm. Stand therefore, having fastened on the belt of truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and, as shoes for your feet, having put on the readiness given by the gospel of peace.” – Ephesians 6:13-15

Christians, it’s time to wake up.

A man who proclaimed womanhood and called himself transgender shot up televangelist Joel Osteen’s Lakewood Church in Houston, Texas on Sunday. He was neutralized by off-duty cops after an exchange of gunfire that stopped the latest transgender anti-Christian terror attack dead in its tracks, but not before a 5-year-old child was left in critical condition and an adult male was also wounded. As usual, the shooting has been minimized and obscured by the pro-trans media, which has refused to even mention the shooter’s transgender identity.

36-year-old transgender church shooter Genessee Ivonne Moreno, who had legally changed his name from Jeffrey Escalante after assuming a fake feminine identity, entered Joel Osteen’s Lakewood Church on Sunday and opened fire.

Moreno-Escalante carried a long rifle and wore a trenchcoat that he claimed was full of explosives, and ultimately ended up exchanging gunfire with off-duty cops when he attempted his anti-Christian massacre.

He also entered the church with a 5-year-old child, the same child who was critically wounded during the attack.

Escalante-Moreno has a lengthy criminal history that dates back to at least 2005, having been charged with numerous violent offenses under his former name of Jeffrey Escalante, including assault, evading, and the unlawful carrying of a weapon, as well as other charges of forgery, theft, and drug possession.

According to multiple media reports, Escalante-Moreno carried an AR-15 inscribed with the phrase “Free Palestine.”

Remarkably, while the corporate media has been able to widely identify the gun that was used in the attack and what was written on it, they’ve largely failed to mention Escalante-Moreno’s transgender identity – par for the course when it comes to the transgender terror attacks that are becoming routine in the United States, as Christianity, the religion that a majority of Americans observe, is constantly demonized in the public square.

The refusal to identify Escalante-Moreno as the biological male that he was includes CNN, which published a lengthy article providing many details about the shooting and the subsequent investigation but completely ignored Escalante-Moreno’s transgender status and even his previous name, under which he committed numerous violent crimes.

“A woman entered a Houston megachurch with a child and began shooting. Here’s what we know,” the CNN headline reads while refusing to actually inform readers of all that is known about the shooter, apparently to not throw off their pro-trans fake news agenda.

As mentioned, the trans attack on Joel Osteen’s Lakewood Church is just the latest instance of trans terrorism to grip the United States.

As National File recently reported, just weeks ago, a trans mass shooter planted an IED in his Iowa school and murdered one of his peers while wounding four other people before dying of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. The IED was ultimately “rendered safe” according to law enforcement.

Read More: Trans Mass Shooter Planted IED in Iowa School

But much like in the Texas church shooting, the corporate media, and even law enforcement, sought to obscure the shooter’s trans identity. To boot, his social media accounts where he publicly claimed to identify as trans and gender-fluid were scrubbed from the internet, in a move that has been slammed as nakedly designed to protect the pro-trans movement.

Read More: TikTok Scrubs Account of Purportedly Trans Iowa Mass Shooter

And both of those attacks came on the heels of several more, including the transgender mass shooting of Christian elementary schoolers and their school employees last year, in Nashville, Tennessee.

In that case, as well, the corporate media and law enforcement tried to cover up the shooter’s female-to-male trans identity and even refused to release her manifesto to the public. However, it was eventually leaked, and laid bare the killer’s plans to “kill those kids” and “those crackers.”

Read More: Nashville Police Chief, Mayor Admit Leaked Trans Terror Manifesto is Real

Fast food chain Chick-fil-A is facing heavy backlash and calls for a boycott after embracing the so-called diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives promoted by Black Lives Matter and other anti-white, pro-gay leftist groups. The chicken sandwich merchant even hired a VP to ensure that Chick-fil-A remains “represented by diverse individuals.”

Chick-fil-A quietly launched its DEI division years ago and hired Erick McReynolds as the chain’s Vice President of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in November of 2021. Word of the company’s DEI embrace recently went viral online and has infuriated Chick-fil-A’s conservative consumer base, which it attracted by way of its longtime, public embrace of Christianity.

On the company’s DEI webpage, Chick-fil-A brags about hiring fewer white, American men to work in its restaurants.

Some Chick-fil-A consumers are threatening a boycott.

But revelations of Chick-fil-A’s DEI department and initiatives should come as no surprise to anyone who’s paid attention in recent years, as the historically pro-Christian company jockeyed for position in a market increasingly dominated by the ESG initiatives backed by Jewish-run BlackRock and others, which admittedly “force” corporations to adopt radically left-wing, racialist and pro-gay policies.

Rather than stand firm, it would appear that Chick-fil-A, from the very top, has embraced the BlackRock ESG lifestyle.

In 2020, as racial hysteria swept America, then-CEO and current Chick-fil-A Chairman Dan Cathy called for white people to get down on their knees and shine black people’s shoes, then give them a hug. Remarkably, Cathy proceeded to actually shine the shoes of black Christian rapper Lecrae, as the two took part in an on-stage discussion.

He stopped short, however, of offering black people stock in Chick-fil-A when prompted by Lecrae.

“We need to just go right on over and shine their shoes,” Cathy said as he approached Lecrae, shoe-shining equipment in hand.

“There’s a time in which we need to have, you know, some personal action here,” Cathy went on. “Maybe need to give them a hug too.”

“And some stock in Chik-fil-A,” Lecrae replied, before laughing hysterically as an unamused Cathy walked back to his seat, eventually boasting that he actually purchased shoe shine kits for Chick-fil-A operators and staff to keep in their restaurants “a number of years ago.”

Watch the video footage below: 

It should come as no surprise that Chick-fil-A is pushing DEI, considering Dan Cathy said in 2020 that white people should shine black people's shoes, and then actually did it on stage.

Funny thing is, he had nothing to say when asked to give black people stock in his company. pic.twitter.com/SXOFjRJdBF

— Frankie Stockes (@realStockes) January 15, 2024

The conservative activist organization Turning Point USA (TPUSA) expelled Christian activist Morgan Ariel from its volunteer ambassador program for defying the “values” of Turning Point USA. In response, Morgan Ariel stated, “Stop Zionism and free America.”

Ariel also noted that “Somebody got the call,” which is a common expression in the modern Dissident Right, employed when a person appears to be getting censored or blacklisted for criticizing the Zionist agenda. But Morgan Ariel has a lot of public support, judging by her X page. In the new age of online media, young people are increasingly calling out Zionist power and hoping that their own countries can be free of Zionist censorship and control.

The censorious X account “StopAntiSemitism” recently flagged a statement Ariel made about the Talmud and pedophilia. StopAntiSemitism tweeted, “We trust you’ll be breaking your relationship with this vile antisemite @TPUSA.”

TPUSA has long been a Zionist organization. Though its figurehead Charlie Kirk has moved closer to America First populist ideals in recent years, the organization appears to remain steadfastly committed to the cause of the Zionist nation-state of Israel. Hyper-Zionist billionaire Bernie Marcus’ foundation reportedly donated more than $1.5 million to TPUSA.

“The TPUSA media rep who texted me/called and gave me less than an hour and a half to respond to them while I was at work in the middle of the afternoon. I replied to the text referenced in this thread and called them back but they did not answer my phone call nor did they reply to my text. I would love to hear what values @TPUSA holds. I’m sure my following would love to know as well,” Morgan Ariel tweeted.

Talk show host Stew Peters may have summed it up best: